Waning Military Heritage

The earliest spontaneous mass protest against the Vietnam War took place on August 26, 1965, when 40,000 draft-age, working-class young men got married before midnight to escape the call-up. The marriage deferment was dubbed the “poor man’s deferment” and was a way out for those unable to afford to go to college or those who did not have the money or connections to avoid the draft. Californians stampeded to Nevada.

People rejoiced in beating Uncle Sam, not in their marriage. Vice President Dick Cheney, with his five deferments, is a representative souvenir of the time. The Vietnam War corrupted the institution of marriage in America. The war also inflicted permanent damage on higher education, medicine, parenthood and patriotism. The large number of parents who condoned and facilitated the quickie weddings revealed an early unease with the Vietnam War. Boys marrying prostitutes, hotrods speeding across the desert and chartered planes making daredevil landings foreshadowed the more desperate draft-dodging schemes to come: obscene tattoos and amputated toes; atheists enrolling in divinity schools; the straight pretending to be gay, the sober to be drunks, the sane to be crazy, and couples conceiving draft-deferment babies.

It is encouraging to read today that the military is losing its appeal as a career and that the U.S. armed forces are having difficulty meeting their quotas of new recruits for the first time since the draft ended in 1973. The fact that the Iraq war has triggered an exodus of active and reserve forces because of their fear of getting killed, injured or deployed for a long period in a war zone is a millennium wake-up call to the military that the armed forces are not being used in a manner that inspires citizens to become soldiers.

Movies depicting the horrors of war, such as Saving Private Ryan, The Thin Red Line and We Were Soldiers, are a positive step. Seeing the ashen faces of young people leaving the theatre is refreshing. A more consorted effort has to be made to expose all our children to the horrors of war. Not just movies. We need more efforts such as the Atomic Bomb Dome in Hiroshima, an area of the city retained as it was after “Little Boy,” the uranium-235 atomic bomb that killed some 200,000 people. And Holocaust museums.

“I want the foolishness of war to end,” said Japanese artist Katsushige Nakahashi, from Otsu City. “If my generation doesn’t talk about World War II, the next generation never will,” he said as he put the finishing touches to the crumpled skin of photos that forms a replica of a Zero fighter that he burned on the 50th anniversary of the end of World War II.

Reading how Serb, Taliban and Iraqi conscripts went into hiding in Afghanistan, Yugoslavia and Iraq in the face of massive bombing when they received their mobilization notices was a reminder of U.S. draft dodgers and conscientious objectors fleeing to Canada and elsewhere during the Vietnam War.

Some believe even George W. Bush went AWOL from the National Guard and deserted the military during the Vietnam War. It is also an encouraging sign of the waning appeal of guns and war at the dawn of the 21st century. There were 3,500 conscientious objectors registered in the U.S. during World War I, 37,000 during World War II, 4,300 during the Korean War and 200,000 during Vietnam. Marine Reservist Lance-Cpl. Stephen Funk became the first conscientious objector to the Iraq war. He was followed by hundreds of soldiers who went missing during home leave. Time will tell what the real number will be. Staff Sgt. Camilo Mejia best articulated why so many were deserting: “You come face to face with your emotions and your feelings and you try to tell yourself that you did it for a good reason, then, you know, it becomes pretty tough to accept it – to willingly be part of the war”.

To make matters worse, many of those soldiers willing to be part of the war effort disobey “suicide mission” orders of their superiors because of inadequate equipment, body armor or security. No different than the high number of patriots and British officers in the Royal Navy and Army that refused to fight against their cousins in America when the 13 colonies produced the Declaration of Independence in 1776 – and all wars since.

A group of Israeli elite commandos in 2003 refused to participate in military operations against Palestinians. Israeli Air Force pilots refuse to bomb civilians inside Palestinian territory because they regard their missions as illegal and immoral. Reserves in the Israel Defense Forces who are prepared to die for Israel refuse to participate in a military occupation that has over the decades made Israel less secure.

Ishai Menuchin, a major and chairman of Yesh Gvul, the Israeli soldiers’ movement for selective refusal, is firm in his justification. “Being a citizen in a democracy carries with it a commitment to democratic values and a responsibility for your actions,” he said, explaining his group’s refusal to serve. “It is morally impossible to be both a devoted democratic citizen and a regular offender against democratic values. Depriving people of the right to equality and freedom, and keeping them under occupation, is by definition an anti-democratic act.”

Former Israeli nuclear technician Mordechai Vanunu spent 18 years in jail for disclosing Israeli nuclear secrets “to prevent a holocaust”. No matter how one feels about what he did, he is to be respected for the principles he believes in and speaks up about.

Listening to U.S. troops who fought to remove Saddam say they have lost faith in the Army is heart-warming. “If Donald Rumsfeld were here, I’d ask him for his resignation,” one disgruntled soldier told ABC’s Good Morning America. “I would ask him why we are still here. I don’t have any clue as to why we are still in Iraq,” another added. “I despise this war, and 99.9 percent of the people I served with feel the same way. We should bring our troops home now,” said U.S. Army Reservist Charity Thomson.

Army Spc. Thomas Wilson of the 278th Regimental Combat Team, comprised mainly of citizen soldiers of the Tennessee Army National Guard, triggered calls for Rumsfeld’s resignation when he asked Rumsfeld why vehicle armor was in short supply. “Why do we soldiers have to dig through local landfills for pieces of scrap metal and compromised ballistic glass to uparmor our vehicles?” he asked. The defense secretary’s curt no-nonsense answer was widely regarded as having betrayed the trust of the soldiers taking heavy losses because of his poor leadership and planning.

Operation Truth, an advocacy group for soldiers and returning war veterans started by Army Lt. Paul Rieckhoff, is comprised of more than 170 Iraq veterans from across the political spectrum. As an infantry platoon leader, Rieckhoff spent 10 months conducting combat operations in central Baghdad. The truth they are advocating is about poor war planning, overstretched troops and ill-equipped soldiers on the front lines. “We’ve been right about every issue,” said Rieckhoff. “Tell me there is a connection to 9/11? There’s not. Are there weapons of mass destruction? There’s not. Tell me the war will be over soon? It won’t.”

Watching families of soldiers killed in Iraq buck the U.S. military culture which prohibits speaking out against a war, marching with black wreaths at Dover Airbase in Delaware where the bodies from Iraq are returned was a millennium reminder that America, including military families, will no longer blindly accept war as a political solution. Their words and actions are echoed by a group of 26 retired U.S. diplomats and military leaders known as Diplomats and Military Commanders for Change. The group includes former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. William J. Crowe Jr., Retired Marine Gen. Joseph P. Hoar, Retired Air Force Gen. Merrill A. McPeak and Retired Adm. Stansfield Turner, the former director of the CIA. They are true patriots who stood up to career politicians and their sclerotic bureaucratic military leadership.

The best news of the 21st century was President George Dubya’s campaign pledge in the 2000 campaign not to “overextend” U.S. forces or send them to police future conflicts, a pledge he made before September 11 and then conveniently forgot. Instead, he cut health care benefits for war veterans and then went to war in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Senate Bill 89 and House Bill 163 introduced during the 2004 legislative session proposed the draft begin again in the spring of 2005. The bills didn’t go far during an election year and may be re-introduced at some later date. Under the proposed legislation, all people between the ages of 18 and 26 would be eligible. Student deferments will not be an option. What is disturbing about the legislation is the secrecy in which it is being broached. The Pentagon has quietly begun a campaign to fill the 10,350 draft board positions and the 11,070 appeal board slots nationwide.

2 thoughts on “Waning Military Heritage

  1. *sigh*

    Sorry dude but this pacifist stuff blows chunks.

    There are mean people out there who will come and get you if they think they can get away with it.

    The lessons of history are not that Vietnam was a mistake.

    The lessons of history are that those who are not prepared militarily will be attacked by those who are.

    Japan attacked us in WWII specifically because they thought we were to weak. They thought we’d cave in after a while and they’d be able to win a diplomatic settlement by wearing us down.

    The North Koreans and Saddam Hussien attacked because they thought we wouldn’t do anything about it.

    The North Vietnamese, the Somalies and the Iraqi’s all used the strategy of bleeding us to get their way.

    None of the above peoples would have been dissuaded by peaceful intentions on our part.

    Want, take, have, was their philosphy of life.

    Mao said – “Power grows out of the barrel of a gun.”

    The communists also said something to the effect of “When the enemy is strong – we negotiate. When the enemy is weak – we attack.”

    Diplomacy for people like that is nothing but a means to put off their enemies until they are strong enough to just take what they want.

    The only thing those poeple understand is force. If you’ve got no force – they will eat you alive.

    Pacifists are the greatest war mongers of all. They make themselves weak – and obvious targets for those who would take advantage of them.

    For every saint at one end of the bell curve there’s a murderer at the other.

    If all we had to deal with were the saints then the Pacifists would be right.

    Disarmament and peace are only up to you if you have the means to defend yourself – if you don’t – you will be attacked. We and the Russians stared each other down over 50 years but never came to full blown war because each knew they couldn’t push the other to far.

    If you disarm and your enemies don’t – you are a fool. Only having the strength to defend yourself is going to get the enemy to take you seriously.

    The world is a cold, hard, viscious place with lots of cruel selfish people in it. Who will come get you if they think they can.

    Saying “Give Peace A Chance” to those people is like a an animal going to slaughter asking the butcher to reconsider his actions.

    It’s just freaking stupid.

    We are at war now with the Muslim Extremists of the world. Either we let them dictate our foreign policy or we fight them.

    Those are the only two choices we have.

    Pseudo intellectuals like yourself and the other pacifists of the world are the best friends these murderer’s have. They are counting on people like you to give in to them and let them have their way.

    Do you want much of the world, to be run by Islamic Theocracy’s like that in Iran? Do you want any dictator with a big enough army to feel he can just go steal his neighbors lands, property and women?

    Right after WWII – people had for a while learned that the only way to deal with someone like Hitler or Stalin was to stand up to them and destroy them. They weren’t going to give you a choice. If you weren’t prepared to kill them they were going to kill you.

    Nothings changed about human nature.

    Just as there have always been monsterous human beings out there – there have always been fools who thought there was some clever little way of getting around them, or putting up with them, or ignoring them until they went away. All because they were to lazy or to frightened to do the things that needed to be done. That or they were stupid enough to actually believe all this love and peace blather they were mouthing.

    Pacifism is just as silly now as it ever was. Essentially, it’s denial. If I just ignore the bad man … he’ll go away.

    Try that with someone intent on robbing you, killing you then raping and killing your wife. You see people like that on the news all the time. Our jails are full of them.

    The difference between these people and the dictators and extremists of the world – is that the later have bigger guns.

    If someone, such as a cop or soldier doesn’t put his flesh and blood between these people and your soft flesh – the bad people of this world will use you, rob you, rape you and kill you.

    Anything else is just silly.

    It’s a sad comment on our degeneate society that so many people think like you or the cowards and fools you’re talking about.

    Yes, if you go into the military you may be killed.

    So what.

    People die all the time.

    They die at the rate of about 50,000 a year every year in car wrecks.

    At least if you die defending your way of life someone else may benefit from your sacrifice.

    How many people are going to benefit from the deaths of those killed in car wrecks?

    If you and the other peace loving peoples of the world really want to save lives – then lobby your govenments for safer transportation.

    Any untimely death is a tragedy.

    It is a tragedy when a young 19 year old soldier dies.

    It is also a tragedy when a young mother and/or her children die in a car wreck.

    Instead of undermining the efforts of those who are in fact noble enough to sacrifice part if not all of their lives to defend the form of government that gives people like you the right to blather idiocy – why not do something that will really make a difference?

    If you really do care about saving lives – put your efforts into an area where you can help – not hurt.

    Nothing is stupider than the morons saying “I support the troops but not the war.”

    No. It doesn’t work that way.

    If you don’t support the war they are fighting, if you whine and call for us to quit – you are helping the enemy who is trying to kill them.

    The enemy will keep trying to kill them instead of quiting as long as they think that morons like you will give in and let them have their way.

    You and and all the good, decent loving pacifists of this world are the type of people such as the Nazi’s and Terrorists count on.

    You are the type of people who bring tragedy to the world.

    And OBTW,

    You have a nice day.

  2. The enemies of freedom get a lot of help from our current leadership.

    When troops and Marines with PTSD and TBI are routinely given bad discharges for “pre-existing personality disorders” and the VA is chronically and deliberately underfunded, I truly wonder what the Neocon’s true motivation is.
    No one should be surprised. This War on Terror is an excellent opportunity for Cheney-Rove, Inc. to burrow deep into the pockets of the vanishing American middle-class.

    When our own Vice-President refers to the troops as “Fuck’em, they’re trailer trash anyway”, little wonder.

Comments are closed.